/k/ Weapons

[ Safe / 1 / bugs / diy / e / m / mc / mu / s / t / truth / tv / w ] [ 18+ / a / b / c / d / f / gif / hd / k / pa / r / r9k / v ]i'm going to block your roosters in with a fence, COCKBLOCKED

New Thread

Click here to upload

No.116
By Anonymous On Friday, 26 Apr, 5:19pm
Until the late 1800’s, military rifles fired large, heavy, relatively slow, soft lead bullets which deformed on impact and reliably incapacitated opponents. In the late 1890’s to early 1900’s, new military rifles were developed which fired smaller diameter, lighter weight, non-deforming FMJ bullets at much higher velocities. The new FMJ bullets initially had round noses, but within 10 years, pointed (spitzer) noses were standard Although the velocities of these new FMJ military bullets were 60 to 100% greater than the older lead bullets, the tissue damage produced by the new higher velocity FMJ bullets was so minimal, that uncomplicated soft tissue wounds frequently healed with treatment limited to aseptic dressings. In addition, compared to the reliable incapacitation produced by the old lower velocity lead bullets, the new higher velocity FMJ bullets proved ineffective at reliably incapacitating opponents in combat, as British troop discovered to their dismay in the Chitral Campaign of 1895.

In an attempt to create a metal jacketed bullet which matched the incapacitation potential of the older .577-450 lead bullets used in their Martini-Henry rifles, the British Dum-Dum arsenal near Calcutta modified the Mk II FMJ into a more effective JSP configuration by removing 1 mm of jacket at the bullet nose; British colonial troops reported that this bullet proved effective during the Tirah campaign in 1897-98. Back in Britain, the Woolwich Arsenal had concurrently worked on an expanding .303 JHP projectile; a series of bullets based on this design, the Mk III, IV, and V, which exhibited moderate deformation and improved incapacitation compared with the round nose MkII FMJ they replaced were adopted beginning in 1897 and proved effective in combat at the Battle of Omdurman in 1898. Anti-British sentiment lead other nations to protest that the .303 expanding bullets were inhumane and culminated in the 1899 Hague Declaration IV in which the signing nations agreed, “…to abstain from the use of bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core or is pierced with incisions.” Note that the U.S. is not a party to the 1899 Hague treaty, but has complied with it in international armed conflict. JAG rulings have stated that the treaty is not applicable to certain SOF or military law enforcement missions. The British replacement for the prohibited expanding .303 bullets was the Mark VII FMJ adopted in 1910 — ironically, the early yaw of the spitzer style Mark VII FMJ bullet produces a more severe wound than the supposedly inhumane bullets! For more information, read Daniel E. Watters superb discussion of these events, as well as this well written article by Mike Waldron: http://pfoa.co.uk/248/dum-dum-bullets.
1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.114
By Anonymous On Tuesday, 23 Apr, 6:48pm
FileName: m1911.jpg
FileSize: 28.56KB
let's talk 1911s for a sec shall we?
i'm looking to pick up my first and don't really have a clue on which repro to get or if i should try to save up for an afterservice milspec
1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.115 ReplyTo
By Anonymous On Tuesday, 23 Apr, 6:51pm
FileName: 1355633316187.jpg
FileSize: 135.04KB
tl;dr
none
No.95
By Bar TtA/2NRNzc! On Monday, 8 Apr, 7:38am
FileName: 1330490418527.jpg
FileSize: 867.24KB
itt we act like /k/iddies, i'll start.
hurdur terminal ballistics means nothing and call of duty is the most realistic shooter ever
blackops 2 is what happened irl and the best game since mw4
glocks are good and deagles from deagle research inc are the best guns
1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
none
No.107 ReplyTo #OP#
By Bar TtA/2NRNzc! On Tuesday, 9 Apr, 7:26am
FileName: 1330490199209.jpg
FileSize: 1.02MB
....i don't think zander got the joke
No.108 ReplyTo
By Cillianonymous bK7y1wQ0SQ! On Tuesday, 9 Apr, 9:04am
Holy shit what the ever loving fuck why would you ever put a scope on a moving part?!  Okay okay, I got a sip of rage from that.  Jesus fucking christ.
No.112 ReplyTo
By Cillianonymous bK7y1wQ0SQ! On Wednesday, 17 Apr, 8:36am
Wait, serious question for a second.  Do you think any kind of optics on a hand gun are worth while?
No.1
By Anonymous On Friday, 22 Mar, 4:56pm
FileName: 1363597289620.jpg
FileSize: 21.61KB

1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.92 ReplyTo #OP#
By Anonymous On Friday, 22 Mar, 5:49pm
FileName: 1355897031977.jpg
FileSize: 233.75KB

No.93 ReplyTo #OP#
By Anonymous On Friday, 22 Mar, 5:50pm
FileName: 1355898360059.jpg
FileSize: 344.84KB

No.94 ReplyTo #OP#
By Anonymous On Friday, 22 Mar, 5:50pm
FileName: 1355897750730.jpg
FileSize: 741.07KB